Consequences the data of the research presented in the article When the image turns case democracy: Aspects of the diffidence in the Brazilian National Congress (Enrique, 2010), consolidate, through study, in a scientific bias, what already if it made general voice in what it refers to the vision that the diverse public have of the Legislative one, of its agents, the politicians, and of its representation. The clear demonstration of that the National Congress is very on this side of what of it if it waits is in the fact of that the reliable lack is generalized in the population. The aggravating one, however, inhabits in the fact of that in social clippings of bigger income (Enrique, 2010? p.18) and of bigger escolaridade (ibid, p.15), the diffidence level is significantly bigger. It is not treated, therefore of the parapatolgica trend of the conscience of certain uninformed individuals in teorizar, without any knowledge or information regarding the subject, expressing irresponsibly, then, a theoretical point of view or assumptions on the performance negative of the Congress. The perceptions expressed for this group of people, critical/conscientious, with bigger degree of airway lighting? natural consequence of bigger escolarizao; with important level of access to the information – decurrent of domicile in privileged geographic localization, as the Southeastern south/and the great centers; with raised cognitiva capacity more; they characterize the negative perceptions and they justify a bigger concern in the persistence of them parliamentarians for the improvement of this image. Despite perceptions of people or groups less abalizados if present more favorable much less critical e, still, that they are such groups or people – in absolute numbers – significantly bigger of what those that compose the parcel of the conscientious ones, belong to this last clipping the formadores of opinion. These, while elements most informed, connaisseur? s, has greater probability to lead those to the position taking front to the possibilities that if present to them, therefore, its perception tends to lock up greater relative impact in the evaluation of the negative or positive trustworthiness of the study object.