The improvements most significant had occurred in the stability politics (passed of position 29,3 in 1998 for 38,3 in 2008) and capacity of being heard and rendering of accounts (of the 55,8 for the 61.1). The corruption control is defined by the Bird as ‘ ‘ the measure of the extension with that the public power is exerted for private profits, including in such a way small how much great forms of corrupo’ ‘. In the question stability politics the country was in the front of 38,3% of the countries. In the case of the rule of law it was better that 46.3% and of regulatory quality, better that 58% of the searched nations. This is the eighth report on governana elaborated for the Group of Research in Development and for the Teams of Growth and Macroeconomics of the World Bank. The institution measures the governana in 212 countries and its pointers are reflected of the perception of the governing and citizens on the subject.

In accordance with the data of the report, Brazil always occupied the half of the table. The medium position can be seen in all the pointers of presented control of the corruption. In 1996, the Country reached note -0,15 in control of the corruption. In its advances, it left the margin of error slightly. The best mark was written down in 2003, when it wrote down +0,13. Worse it was in 2007, when the control of the corruption fell -0,17.O governana concept, for the World Bank, means the capacity of the traditions and institutions of a country to exert its authority. In the report, the control of the corruption is only one of the six analyzed criteria to establish the governana level.

To establish a complete panorama, Brazil also was esmiuado in terms of Rule of law, Efficiency of the Government, Absence of Violence/Terrorism and Stability Politics, Civil Participation and Transparency and Regulatory Quality. In all these criteria had improvement, but the pointers point that, comparativily, Brazil is behind the majority of the countries. The case most emblematic is of the Rule of law criterion, with pointer -0,30, fellow creature to the one of China (- 0,33), taking in account margin of error of 0,13. The best Brazilian mark is in the criterion Civil Participation and Transparency, where it reached mark +0.51, with margin of error of 0,13. The evaluation, however, is far from being the ideal. Germany and Denmark had written down +1,34 and +1,48, respectively. BibliografiJornal Leaf of S. Pablo of 30 of June of 2009 Periodical the Globe of 30 of June of 2009 Periodical Economic Value of 30 of June of 2009 Periodical the State of S. Pablo of 30 of June of 2009>