Citizenship State
Venezuela has problems that are not cyclical, but structural, historical, such as insecurity, corruption, social inequality, poverty, requiring beyond a political decision to fight them which is, practically, one action of moral and educational effect in the long term, involving all sectors and expressions of their society. Logically, it is discounted the political decision. The State (the citizen also is how uneducated, as we’ll see) will have to go to the front, as a basic propellant in thick, branching its actions through the channels at your fingertips: media, educational policy, legal corpus, fighting crime and punishing (case insecurity), combating impunity (corruption case), propaganda, financial support, policy and institutional, among others, exceedingly, example itself, for situations where fit the behavioral moralizing action. Is obliged to refocus, by humanistic, and positivist ideology by contractual delegation, its own step and that of its citizens, figure who is morally should and who is necessary and even affected expression. His work is to extend Executive, carpet welcome to desirable values and attitudes citizens on some roads, if still not forged, at least mentioned, as the already observed as principles. But fundamental drive, specifically, of the new morality (new as in situ is scarce) know is the same citizen, stronghold of any demonstration or political structuring. On him shall be borne any measure that points to new revivals, pointing even to his moral reformulation in both human figure living in flagrant and transient. Because the State, according to social contract, is delegation and sum of wills for growth and prosperity in society, according to the man accessed losing the care of their old and original wild nature and agrees to the existence of an entity that norme it and protects in return for his subjection to the law and the compliance of duties. More to contour this guise status, as guiding principle but joint wills citizen expression, do nothing but over-riding the individual as a vital agent (as it is to be expected in a society of humans), individual or citizen susceptible to ideas, groupings or actions capable of influencing the letter and act of a State which regulates, but also capable of tainting the same drafting of the social agreement according to their moral run.