If you are going to write about a problem that you have not experimented, you will have to make more investigation. The information of public dominion is much and truthful, but it lacks that human touch, that human emotion that is going to jump of your bill of sale de towards the minds and hearts of your readers. You are going to have to find to that the same has happened through personally, so that you can understand better the problem, and why it is so important to provide a solution it. Then surplus to say that you do not try to invent problems that you have not had to only save time. It will not sound real.

The people who really have that problem definitively will be able to notice the difference if you say something like: " A cigarette wished so much that did not know what to do. I decided to smoke one, although it felt culprit to me from the moment in which encend." Instead of " Everything what could think era about smoking My hands shook while thought about abrir a small box, taking a cigarette, to put it in my mouth and to ignite it. I could not resist more. I went to the place where it had hidden a small box of cigarettes days before I took, it I abr and it as quickly as possible. I put one in my mouth in time record. But just before catching it, a fault sensation seized of me, and I knew that it did not have to smoke it. Nevertheless, it gained the addiction by the nicotine, and fum." Which of these paragraphs sounds more like somebody than envelope knows what is to try to stop smoking? If you think that it is the second, congratulations. It was too obvious, you do not create? That type of emotions " crudas" they are those that you must catch for any problem on which you write, in order that you let know to your readers who you understand reason why they are happening when trying to control its problem.